Ablation Versus Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: Results From the CABANA Trial
- PMID: 33554614
- PMCID: PMC8030730
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050991
VSports最新版本 - Ablation Versus Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: Results From the CABANA Trial
"VSports app下载" Abstract
Background: In patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation (AF), several clinical trials have reported improved outcomes, including freedom from AF recurrence, quality of life, and survival, with catheter ablation. This article describes the treatment-related outcomes of the AF patients with heart failure enrolled in the CABANA trial (Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation). VSports手机版.
Methods: The CABANA trial randomized 2204 patients with AF who were ≥65 years old or <65 years old with ≥1 risk factor for stroke at 126 sites to ablation with pulmonary vein isolation or drug therapy including rate or rhythm control drugs. Of these, 778 (35%) had New York Heart Association class >II at baseline and form the subject of this article. The CABANA trial's primary end point was a composite of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest. V体育安卓版.
Results: Of the 778 patients with heart failure enrolled in CABANA, 378 were assigned to ablation and 400 to drug therapy. Ejection fraction at baseline was available for 571 patients (73. 0%), and 9. 3% of these had an ejection fraction <40%, whereas 11. 7% had ejection fractions between 40% and 50%. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the ablation arm had a 36% relative reduction in the primary composite end point (hazard ratio, 0. 64 [95% CI, 0. 41-0. 99]) and a 43% relative reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0. 57 [95% CI, 0. 33-0. 96]) compared with drug therapy alone over a median follow-up of 48. 5 months. AF recurrence was decreased with ablation (hazard ratio, 0. 56 [95% CI, 0. 42-0. 74]). The adjusted mean difference for the AFEQT (Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life) summary score averaged over the entire 60-month follow-up was 5. 0 points, favoring the ablation arm (95% CI, 2. 5-7. 4 points), and the MAFSI (Mayo Atrial Fibrillation-Specific Symptom Inventory) frequency score difference was -2 V体育ios版. 0 points, favoring ablation (95% CI, -2. 9 to -1. 2). .
Conclusions: In patients with AF enrolled in the CABANA trial who had clinically diagnosed stable heart failure at trial entry, catheter ablation produced clinically important improvements in survival, freedom from AF recurrence, and quality of life relative to drug therapy. These results, obtained in a cohort most of whom had preserved left ventricular function, require independent trial verification. Registration: URL: https://www. clinicaltrials. gov/ct2/show/NCT00911508; Unique identifier: NCT0091150 VSports最新版本. .
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials. gov NCT00911508 NCT00911508 NCT00091150. V体育平台登录.
Keywords: antiarrhythmic drug; atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; heart failure; paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; persistent atrial fibrillation; pulmonary vein VSports注册入口. .
"VSports在线直播" Figures
Comment in
-
"V体育平台登录" The Cabana Trial and Heart Failure: Some Sun and Some Shade.Circulation. 2021 Apr 6;143(14):1391-1393. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.053160. Epub 2021 Apr 5. Circulation. 2021. PMID: 33819080 No abstract available.
References
-
- Nguyen BO, Rienstra M, Hobbelt AH, Tijssen JGP, Smit MD, Tieleman RG, Geelhoed B, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Crijns H, Van Gelder IC, et al. Optimal treatment of underlying conditions improves rhythm control outcome in atrial fibrillation - data from RACE 3. Am Heart J. 2020;226:235–239. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.12.005. - DOI - PubMed
-
- AlTurki A, Proietti R, Dawas A, Alturki H, Huynh T, Essebag V. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019;19:18. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-0998-2. - DOI (VSports在线直播) - PMC - PubMed
-
- Di Biase L, Mohanty P, Mohanty S, Santangeli P, Trivedi C, Lakkireddy D, Reddy M, Jais P, Themistoclakis S, Dello Russo A, et al. Ablation versus amiodarone for treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with congestive heart failure and an implanted device: results from the AATAC multicenter randomized trial. Circulation. 2016;133:1637–1644. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019406. - "VSports最新版本" DOI - PubMed
-
- Hunter RJ, Berriman TJ, Diab I, Kamdar R, Richmond L, Baker V, Goromonzi F, Sawhney V, Duncan E, Page SP, et al. A randomized controlled trial of catheter ablation versus medical treatment of atrial fibrillation in heart failure (the CAMTAF trial). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:31–38. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000806. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
V体育官网 - MeSH terms
- VSports - Actions
- "V体育2025版" Actions
Associated data (VSports注册入口)
- "V体育平台登录" Actions
- Actions (VSports注册入口)
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
VSports最新版本 - Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
"V体育官网" Medical
