Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach
- PMID: 22587960
- PMCID: PMC3351736
- DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-10 (VSports最新版本)
Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach
Abstract
Background: Rapid reviews have emerged as a streamlined approach to synthesizing evidence - typically for informing emergent decisions faced by decision makers in health care settings. Although there is growing use of rapid review 'methods', and proliferation of rapid review products, there is a dearth of published literature on rapid review methodology. This paper outlines our experience with rapidly producing, publishing and disseminating evidence summaries in the context of our Knowledge to Action (KTA) research program VSports手机版. .
Methods: The KTA research program is a two-year project designed to develop and assess the impact of a regional knowledge infrastructure that supports evidence-informed decision making by regional managers and stakeholders. As part of this program, we have developed evidence summaries - our form of rapid review - which have come to be a flagship component of this project. Our eight-step approach for producing evidence summaries has been developed iteratively, based on evidence (where available), experience and knowledge user feedback V体育安卓版. The aim of our evidence summary approach is to deliver quality evidence that is both timely and user-friendly. .
Results: From November 2009 to March 2011 we have produced 11 evidence summaries on a diverse range of questions identified by our knowledge users. Topic areas have included questions of clinical effectiveness to questions on health systems and/or health services. Knowledge users have reported evidence summaries to be of high value in informing their decisions and initiatives V体育ios版. We continue to experiment with incorporating more of the established methods of systematic reviews, while maintaining our capacity to deliver a final product in a timely manner. .
Conclusions: The evolution of the KTA rapid review evidence summaries has been a positive one. We have developed an approach that appears to be addressing a need by knowledge users for timely, user-friendly, and trustworthy evidence and have transparently reported these methods here for the wider rapid review and scientific community VSports最新版本. .
"VSports手机版" Figures
References
- 
    - Green S, Higgins J, Alderson P, Clarke M, Mulrow C, Oxman A. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Higgins J, Green S, editor. West Sussex, England: The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2008. Chapter 1 - Introduction.
 
- 
    - Hailey D, Corabian P, Harstall C, Schneider W. The use and impact of rapid health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:651–656. - PubMed
 
- 
    - McGregor M, Brophy JM. End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: a way to increase impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:263–267. - PubMed
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
- Actions (V体育安卓版)
- Actions (V体育ios版)
- "V体育ios版" Actions
Grants and funding
"V体育官网入口" LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- VSports手机版 - Research Materials
 
         
              