VSports在线直播 - In this Book
V体育ios版 - Suing Alma Mater: Higher Education and the Courts
Book
2013
Published by:
Johns Hopkins University Press
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

"V体育2025版" summary
This careful reading of six legal cases in American higher education is an essential primer for understanding contemporary litigation.Winner of the Steven S. Goldberg Award for Distinguished Scholarship in Education Law of the Education Law AssociationAlthough much has been written about U.S. Supreme Court decisions involving higher education, little has been said about the foundational case law and litigation patterns emerging from the lower courts. As universities become increasingly legislated, regulated, and litigious, campuses have become testing grounds for a host of constitutional challenges. From faculty and student free speech to race- or religion-based admissions policies, Suing Alma Mater describes the key issues at play in higher education law.Eminent legal scholar Michael A. Olivas considers higher education litigation in the latter half of the twentieth century and the rise of "purposive organizations,” like the American Civil Liberties Union and the Alliance Defense Fund (now known as the Alliance Defending Freedom), that exist to advance litigation. He reviews more than 120 college cases brought before the Supreme Court in the past fifty years and then discusses six key cases in depth. Suing Alma Mater provides a clear-eyed perspective on the legal issues facing higher education today.
Table of Contents
Cover
Title Page (VSports最新版本)
pp. i-iii
"V体育平台登录" Copyright Page
pp. iv
Contents
pp. v-vi
Preface
pp. vii-xiv
Part I
V体育官网 - Chapter One. A Primer on Higher Education Law in the United States
pp. 1-24
Chapter Two. A Brief History of Higher Education Litigation in the United States Supreme Court
pp. 25-38
Chapter Three. Making It to the Supreme Court and the Rise of Purposive Organizations
pp. 39-50
Part II
"VSports手机版" Chapter Four. The Traditional Model of Higher Education in the Litigation Spotlight: United States v. Fordice
pp. 51-73
Chapter Five. Hopwood v. Texas: âA University May Properly Favor One Applicant Over Another Because of His Ability to Play the Cello, Make a Down. eld Tackle, or Understand Chaos Theoryâ
pp. 74-90
Chapter Six. Abrams v. Baylor College of Medicine: Jews Need Not Apply (V体育2025版)
pp. 91-97
V体育ios版 - Chapter Seven. Axson-Flynn v. Johnson: âTalk to Some Other Mormon Girls Who Are Good Mormons, Who Donât Have a Problem with Thisâ
pp. 98-107
Chapter Eight. Location, Location, Location: Richards v. League of United Latin American Citizens and the Cartography of Colleges
pp. 108-119
Chapter Nine. Clark v. Claremont University Center: âI Mean, Us White People Have Rights, Tooâ
pp. 120-130
Chapter Ten. The Developing Law of Faculty Discontent: The Garcetti Effect
pp. 131-136
Conclusion. My Friends, Special Programs, and Pipelines
pp. 137-154
Appendix A. Annual Reviews of Higher Education Law
pp. 155-157
Appendix B. United States v. Fordice, 505 U.S. 717 (1992) Case History
pp. 158-160
Notes
pp. 161-190
V体育2025版 - Bibliography
pp. 191-210
Index
pp. 211-221
ISBN | 9781421428239 |
---|---|
Related ISBN(s) | 9781421409221, 9781421409238, 9781421409245 |
DOI | 10.1353/book.47866![]() |
MARC Record | Download |
OCLC | 966768093 |
Pages | 240 |
Launched on MUSE | 2017-01-01 |
Language | English |
Open Access | Yes |
Creative Commons | CC-BY-NC-ND |