VSports在线直播 - In this Book

V体育ios版 - Suing Alma Mater: Higher Education and the Courts

Book
Michael A. Olivas
2013
buy this book Buy This Book in Print
"V体育2025版" summary
This careful reading of six legal cases in American higher education is an essential primer for understanding contemporary litigation.Winner of the Steven S. Goldberg Award for Distinguished Scholarship in Education Law of the Education Law AssociationAlthough much has been written about U.S. Supreme Court decisions involving higher education, little has been said about the foundational case law and litigation patterns emerging from the lower courts. As universities become increasingly legislated, regulated, and litigious, campuses have become testing grounds for a host of constitutional challenges. From faculty and student free speech to race- or religion-based admissions policies, Suing Alma Mater describes the key issues at play in higher education law.Eminent legal scholar Michael A. Olivas considers higher education litigation in the latter half of the twentieth century and the rise of "purposive organizations,” like the American Civil Liberties Union and the Alliance Defense Fund (now known as the Alliance Defending Freedom), that exist to advance litigation. He reviews more than 120 college cases brought before the Supreme Court in the past fifty years and then discusses six key cases in depth. Suing Alma Mater provides a clear-eyed perspective on the legal issues facing higher education today.

Table of Contents

Cover

Title Page (VSports最新版本)

pp. i-iii

"V体育平台登录" Copyright Page

pp. iv

Contents

pp. v-vi

Preface

pp. vii-xiv

Part I

V体育官网 - Chapter One. A Primer on Higher Education Law in the United States

pp. 1-24

Chapter Two. A Brief History of Higher Education Litigation in the United States Supreme Court

pp. 25-38

Chapter Three. Making It to the Supreme Court and the Rise of Purposive Organizations

pp. 39-50

Part II

"VSports手机版" Chapter Four. The Traditional Model of Higher Education in the Litigation Spotlight: United States v. Fordice

pp. 51-73

Chapter Five. Hopwood v. Texas: “A University May Properly Favor One Applicant Over Another Because of His Ability to Play the Cello, Make a Down. eld Tackle, or Understand Chaos Theory”

pp. 74-90

Chapter Six. Abrams v. Baylor College of Medicine: Jews Need Not Apply (V体育2025版)

pp. 91-97

V体育ios版 - Chapter Seven. Axson-Flynn v. Johnson: “Talk to Some Other Mormon Girls Who Are Good Mormons, Who Don’t Have a Problem with This”

pp. 98-107

Chapter Eight. Location, Location, Location: Richards v. League of United Latin American Citizens and the Cartography of Colleges

pp. 108-119

Chapter Nine. Clark v. Claremont University Center: “I Mean, Us White People Have Rights, Too”

pp. 120-130

Chapter Ten. The Developing Law of Faculty Discontent: The Garcetti Effect

pp. 131-136

Conclusion. My Friends, Special Programs, and Pipelines

pp. 137-154

Appendix A. Annual Reviews of Higher Education Law

pp. 155-157

Appendix B. United States v. Fordice, 505 U.S. 717 (1992) Case History

pp. 158-160

Notes

pp. 161-190

V体育2025版 - Bibliography

pp. 191-210

Index

pp. 211-221
Back To Top