VSports最新版本 - Hypoxia stimulates the cytoplasmic localization of oncogenic long noncoding RNA LINC00152 in colorectal cancer

Introduction

Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men (746,000 cases annually, 10. 0% of total cancers) and the second in women (614,000 cases, 9. 2% of total cancers) (1). The early stages of CRC can be detected by occult blood examination in stool samples or endoscopic examination. Subsequently, CRC can be treated with surgery and chemotherapy, which have been shown to increase patient survival. However, advanced cases exhibiting metastasis to distant organs are associated with worsened survival rates, indicating the rationale for further study of the underlying mechanisms of CRC (1) VSports注册入口.

Although cancer is a genetic disease, epigenetic alterations also play a pivotal role in cancer development; eventually, the hypoxic responses within the tumor microenvironment characterize the malignant behavior of tumors as a hallmark of cancer (2,3). Indeed, recent advances in the high-throughput, next generation sequence technology have aided in the identification and characterization of long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), which is a type of noncoding RNA (ncRNA) exceeding 200 nucleotides in length, and epigenetic alterations, which are defined as mechanisms leading to changes in gene expression related to cellular biology and tissue homeostasis but not involving changes in the DNA sequence (4). HOX transcript antisense RNA (HOTAIR), a human gene located on chromosome 12, is the first example of lncRNA expressed on one chromosome and influencing transcription on another chromosome (5). HOTAIR mediates the trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 and demethylation of histone H3 at dimethyl lysine 4 via the recruitment of polycomb repressive complex 2 and lysine-specific demethylase 1/co-repressor of RE1-silencing transcription factor (coREST)/REST complex to target gene promoters. The recruitment of these factors leads to gene silencing in the nucleus of cancer cells in gastrointestinal and lung tumors, which is associated with patient prognosis (6). Subsequently, numerous studies have indicated that not only mutations or altered expression of mRNA or protein-coding genes but also mutations and deregulation of ncRNAs, particularly lncRNA, play major roles in cancer development (7) V体育官网入口. It has been reported that several other lncRNAs, including MALAT1, CCAT2, SPRY4-IT1, RSU1P2, CCHE1, lncRNA-EBIC and plasmacytoma variant translocation 1 (PVT1), are also involved in cancer (8). Moreover, PVT1, a newly discovered lncRNA, is a potential biomarker for clinicopathological characteristics of different types of cancer (9). Recent studies indicate roles of lincRNAs in CRC (Table I). In cancer, lncRNAs are involved in the biological behavior of tumors, altering cancer cell localization and turnover (10). Although multiple lncRNAs are involved in the biological processes within the nucleus, and recent studies have indicated that lncRNAs, such as Xist, nuclear-enriched abundant transcript 1 (NEAT1), MALAT1 and TERRA, are involved in various nuclear functions, the differential roles of lncRNAs in the cytoplasm and nucleus remains poorly understood (11).

Table I LncRNAs associated with CRC.

Table I

LncRNAs associated with CRC.

LncRNA	Name	Function	Expression	Mechanism	Refs.
LINC-PINT	Long intergenic non-protein coding RNA, p53 induced transcript	Inhibits cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis	Downregulated	Interacts with the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) to silence gene targets	26
PR-lncRNA-1	p53-regulated lncRNA-1	Inhibits cell proliferation, and promotes apoptosis	Downregulated	Enhances p53 transcriptional activation	27
MALAT1	Metastasis associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1	Promotes cell proliferation and metastasis	Overexpressed	Related to alternative splicing and active transcription	28
PTENP1	Phosphatase and tensin homolog pseudogene 1	Inhibits cell proliferation, migration, invasion and tumor growth	Locus selectively lost in sporadic colon cancer	Decoy for microRNAs that target PTEN	29
CCAT2	Colon cancer associated transcript 2	Promotes tumor growth, metastasis, chromosomal instability	Overexpressed	Enhancement of WNT signaling activity	30
HOTAIR	Hox antisense intergenic RNA	Cancer progression by remodeling the chromatin landscape	Overexpressed	Modular scaffold by interacting with PRC2	31
LINC00152	NA	ceRNA is suggested	Overexpressed	Hypoxia pathway	Present

[i] NA, not applicable.

In contrast to the epigenetic control of lncRNAs, which bind to histone-modifying enzymes in case of HOTAIR, little is known regarding the cytoplasmic involvement of lncRNAs. Recent studies indicated that a small fraction of ncRNAs, such as microRNAs, functions as competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA). In the context of ceRNA, some pseudogene RNAs can act as 'sponges' through the competitive binding of common miRNA, thereby attenuating repression via the sequestration of miRNAs from the parental mRNA (12). Because ceRNAs include all transcripts, such as mRNA, tRNA, rRNA, lncRNA, pseudogene RNA and circular RNA, all of which may become targets of miRNA depending on the spatiotemporal situation, it is suggested that lncRNAs may function as a 'sponge' and that a competitive balance may exist between ncRNAs and the target mRNA (12) VSports在线直播.

In the tumor microenvironment, several processes within the transcriptional networks of p53 and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α) are modulated by hypoxia (13), and defines hypoxic glycolysis metabolism in normoxia, which characterizes cancer cells, as the so-called Warburg effect, cancer metabolism (14).

In the present study, we analyzed the expression of lncRNA under normoxic and hypoxic conditions and found that oncogenic long intergenic noncoding RNA 152 (LINC00152) expression is increased in the cytoplasm during hypoxia in CRC cells. A sequence data study indicated that LINC00152 shares the microRNA-binding sites miR-138 and miR-193, which are located in the peptide-coding mRNA of the HIF1 gene VSports. A study of clinical samples further supported the significance of LINC00152.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and cell culture

The human CRC cell line HCT-116 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37°C under 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator VSports app下载.

Separation of nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions

To separate the total cellular fractions into nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions, we used a PARIS kit (AM1921; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Yokohama, Japan) according to the manufacturer's protocol. This kit enables the isolation of both RNA and protein from the same experimental sample and also permits the separation of nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions prior to RNA and/or protein isolation V体育官网.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) array of lncRNA

We performed an lncRNA PCR array using a Human Cancer PathwayFinder RT2 lncRNA PCR array (LAHS-002Z; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the protocol detailed in the RT2 Profiler PCR array Handbook. This array profiles the expression of 84 lncRNAs that are differentially expressed in tumors compared with normal tissue. Briefly, total RNA was extracted from cultured cells using TRIzol® RNA isolation reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as previously described (15). The RNA from each fraction was extracted using a PARIS kit. cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of RNA using an RT2 First Strand kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. PCR was performed in an Applied Biosystems 7900 HT Fast Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) using the Thunderbird® SYBR® qPCR mix (Toyobo Life Science, Osaka, Japan). The cycling conditions consisted of 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, and 60°C for 1 min.

Real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from the cultured cells using TRIzol® RNA isolation reagents. cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of the total RNA using a High Capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's protocol. PCR was performed in a Light Cycler™ 2.0 system (Roche Applied Science, Tokyo, Japan) using the Thunderbird® SYBR® qPCR mix. The expression level was calculated using the ΔΔCq method (16). The calculated values were then normalized against the expression of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) or RPLP0 for mRNA. The PCR reaction mixture consisted of 5 µl of 1/100 cDNA, 10.0 µl of Thunderbird™ SYBR® qPCR mix, 4.0 µl of water, and 0.5 µl of each primer. The amplification protocol consisted of 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 sec, annealing at 60°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 30 sec.

The following primers were used: CA9, 5′-CTAGAGGCTGGATCTTGGAGAA-3′ (forward) and 5′-CTTGGCAGTTAAAAGGAAGTGG-3′ (reverse); LINC00152, 5′-CTCCAGCACCTCTACCTGTTG-3′ (forward) and 5′-GGACAAGGGATTAAGACACACA-3′ (reverse); GAPDH, 5′-AGCCACATCGCTCAGACAC-3′ (forward) and 5′-GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC-3′ (reverse); RPLP0, 5′-AGCCACATCGCTCAGACAC-3′ (forward) and 5′-GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC-3′ (reverse).

Statistical analysis

Statistically significant differences were determined by a Student's t-test and Fisher's exact probability test as appropriate. JMP® Pro12 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. The data are reported as the mean ± SEM. Results were considered statistically significant when P-value of <0.05 was obtained.

Results

Identification of hypoxia-regulated lncRNA

We performed an lncRNA PCR array using the total RNA of HCT-116 cells incubated for 72 h under conditions of hypoxia (1% O2) or normoxia (20% O2) (Fig. 1A). As a preliminary experiment, we assessed the level of carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) expression, which is known to be an indicator of hypoxia (17). CA9 expression was significantly higher in HCT-116 cells incubated under hypoxic conditions than in those incubated under normoxic conditions (Fig. 1B). We validated that the hypoxic environment had been reproduced by the hypoxic incubator. Next we performed study of lncRNA expression using the Human Cancer PathwayFinder RT2 lncRNA PCR array, which included 84 sets of primers for lncRNAs (Fig. 2A). The lncRNA PCR array revealed that 30 lncRNAs were upregulated (Fig. 2B) and 16 lncRNAs were downregulated (Fig. 2C) under hypoxic conditions compared with normoxic conditions. Among the lncRNAs upregulated under hypoxic conditions, some were previously reported to be upregulated due to hypoxia (18).

Figure 1 Hypoxia-induced long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). (A) Overview of lncRNA PCR array for total RNA. HCT-116 cell lines were used and were incubated under hypoxic or normoxic conditions for 72 h. Total RNA was extracted and used for lncRNA PCR array. (B) CA9 mRNA relative expression normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) is shown as based on qRT-PCR analysis using HCT-116 cells cultured under normoxic or hypoxic condition. *P<0.05.

Figure 2 Results of the hypoxia-induced lncRNA PCR array. (A) Heat map showing the expression of 84 long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). The fold-change in expression was determined under hypoxic/normoxic condition; lncRNAs with red background more expressed under hypoxic than normoxic condition, which indicates upregulated expression of lncRNAs under hypoxic conditions (B). In contrast, lncRNAs with green background more expressed under normoxic than hypoxic condition, which indicated downregulated expression of lncRNAs under hypoxic condition (C). Data of 10 lncRNAs with a white background are lacking. (B) Upregulated lncRNAs under hypoxic conditions. Thirty lncRNAs with a fold-change of >1.5 were determined to be significantly upregulated. Some lncRNAs with '*' were previously reported to be upregulated under hypoxic condition. (C) Downregulated lncRNAs under hypoxic conditions. Sixteen lncRNAs with a fold-change of <0.67 were determined to be significantly downregulated.

Identification of lncRNAs that are downregulated in the nucleus and upregulated in the cytoplasm under hypoxic conditions

We performed an lncRNA PCR array using nuclear or cytoplasmic RNA of HCT-116 cells incubated for 72 h under conditions of hypoxia (1% O2) or normoxia (20% O2) (Fig. 3A). As a preliminary experiment, we determined the level of NEAT1 expression, which is known to be a nuclear lncRNA. This preliminary experiment demonstrated that NEAT1 was mainly expressed in the nucleus (Fig. 3B), which indicated adequate separation of the total fraction into nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions. Fig. 4A shows the results of the lncRNA PCR array of the nucleus, and Fig. 4B shows the results of the lncRNA PCR array of the cytoplasm. We focused on the lncRNAs that were downregulated in the nucleus and upregulated in the cytoplasm under hypoxic conditions because they may function as ceRNAs. The PCR array revealed that, under hypoxic conditions, nine lncRNAs were upregulated in the cytoplasm, 46 were downregulated in the nucleus, and five were downregulated in the nucleus but upregulated in the cytoplasm (Fig. 5A). Interestingly, these five lncRNAs were included in the 30 lncRNAs that were upregulated under hypoxic conditions compared with normoxic conditions (Fig. 2B).

Figure 3 The long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) PCR array for nuclear or cytoplasmic fraction (A) Overview of lncRNA PCR array for nuclear or cytoplasmic fraction. The PARIS kit were used to separate the total cellular fractions into nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions. (B) Nuclear-enriched abundant transcript 1 (NEAT1) relative expression normalized glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) by qRT-PCR using each fraction of HCT-116 cells incubated under normoxic or hypoxic condition. *P<0.05.

Figure 4 Scatter plots of the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) PCR array. (A) Nuclear and (B) cytoplasmic fraction data. Each dot represents an lncRNA. The x- and y-axes of the graphs show expression under normoxic and hypoxic condition, respectively. Five lncRNAs [plasmacytoma variant translocation 1 (PVT1), LINC00152, LUCAT1, POU5F1P5 and HIF1A-AS2] were upregulated in cytoplasm and downregulated in nucleus under hypoxia.

Figure 5 Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) upregulated in the cytoplasm and downregulated in the nucleus under hypoxia. (A) Summary of lncRNA PCR array for each fraction. Nine lncRNAs upregulated in cytoplasm under hypoxia. Forty-six lncRNAs downregulated in nucleus under hypoxia. Five lncRNAs upregulated in cytoplasm and downregulated in nucleus under hypoxia. (B) Relative expressions of five lncRNAs normalized to RPLP0 by qRT-PCR. Among five lncRNAs, the expression levels of LINC00152 and plasmacytoma variant translocation 1 (PVT1) were higher than the other lncRNAs. (C) Relative expression of lncRNA using TCGA database (https://cancergenome.nih.gov/) of colorectal adenocarcinoma (COADREAD) for LINC00152 and PVT1. *P<0.001. (D) Kaplan-Meier curve of overall survival using TCGA database of colorectal adenocarcinoma (COADREAD). COADREAD database includes 615 CRC patient data. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed using the log-rank test.

LINC00152 is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer

To validate the expression of the five lncRNAs that were downregulated in the nucleus and upregulated in the cytoplasm, we performed qRT-PCR using HCT-116 cells. The data showed that the expression levels of LUCAT1, POU5F1P5 and HIF1A-AS2 were lower than those of other lncRNAs (Fig. 5B). Thus, among the five lncRNAs, we focused on LINC00152 and PVT1. To study the significance of both LINC00152 and PVT1 in CRC patients, we used the TCGA database of colorectal adenocarcinoma (COADREAD). Data showed that both LINC00152 and PVT1 exhibited a higher level of expression in the tumor than in the normal tissue (Fig. 5C), and a high expression of LINC00152 was associated with a reduced overall survival rate (P=0.027) (Fig. 5D).

Discussion

In this study, five types of lncRNAs exhibiting enhanced expression under hypoxic conditions showed decreased expression in the nucleus and increased expression in the cytoplasm. Based on the expression data, we focused on LINC00152, which has relatively high expression among the lncRNAs. LINC00152 is involved in cell growth, cycle arrest, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and invasion in gastric cancers (19). Moreover, the plasma levels of LINC00152 achieve good diagnostic accuracy for HCC tumorigenesis and metastasis, and may act as novel biomarkers for HCC (20). Even in the data we examined in the TCGA database for patients with CRC (COADREAD), the expression of LINC00152 was more in tumors than in normal tissues, and the increased expression was associated with poor prognosis, which was consistent with a previous study (Fig. 5C and D). The present data are compatible with the notion that LINC00152 exhibits oncogenic function.

It is known that ceRNA binds miRNA in a nucleotide sequence-dependent manner and regulates miRNA as a decoy. Because this lncRNA-miRNA interaction occurs in the cytoplasm and most lncRNA is localized in the nucleus, we supposed that the hypoxia may induce the transformation of lncRNA function, so that it changes its localization from the nucleus to the cytoplasm in response to a hypoxic microenvironment.

Recently, it was reported that LINC00152 competes with miR-193a-3p as a ceRNA in colorectal cancers and is involved in the anticancer drug resistance to oxaliplatin (21). In addition, LINC00152 competes with miR-138 in gall bladder cancers, which suppresses HIF1A downstream of hypoxia pathway, thereby affecting cancer metastasis and EMT, which characterizes the metastasis of malignant cancer cells (22). The database study [miRcode; http://www.mircode.org; (23)] enabled us to identify the binding sites of not only previously reported miR-138 and miR-193 but also others, such as miR-150, miR-155, miR-31 and miR-205, as shared binding sites for LINC00152 and HIF1A, suggesting their ceRNA functionality. Thus, it was proposed that LINC00152 expression in the cytoplasm increases under hypoxic conditions and that it may act as a decoy for miRNAs involved in malignant cancers.

Previous studies indicated that the hypoxia inducible system is controlled by the post-translational modifications, as such involving Hif1 protein degradation (2,3), in addition to our findings showing that LINC00152 is involved in the HIF1A mRNA translation by miRNA mechanism. Given that hypoxic condition induces the stabilization of Hif1 protein, which induces chemo-resistance and EMT pathway (2,3), the present study indicates that the LINC00152 pathway collaborates with the post-translational pathway and enhances the tumor promoting function of Hif1.

Reportedly the study of a long non-coding antisense RNA affecting Uchl1 protein translation showed that rapamycin substantially increased antisense Uchl1 concentration in the cytoplasmic fraction and decreased antisense Uchl1 concentration in the nucleolar fraction, which correlates with the expression of Uchl1 protein, suggesting antisense Uchl1 localization can be regulated by the mTOR pathway (24). It is supposed that stress-dependent nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of lncRNAs may be a common strategy to regulate translation. Although these concepts need further clarification in future studies, we showed in the present study that the hypoxic condition induced the translocation of LINC00152 from nucleus to cytoplasm, and may function as ceRNA against miRNA, which targets HIF1A, and we supposed their relevance with the mTOR pathway (25).

Previously reported lncRNAs associated with CRC are shown in Table I. In this study using colon cancer cells, we identified five types of hypoxia-induced lncRNA which exhibit decreased expression in the nucleus and increased expression in the cytoplasm. It is suggested that LINC00152, which is related to various miRNAs, is associated with poor prognosis in patients with CRC. Further studies are necessary to identify useful biomarkers for the development of innovative therapeutic targets.

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of our laboratories for their helpful discussions. We thank Drs Tamura and Ikenaga for the careful arrangement of clinical samples; Dr Yamamoto, Division of Health Sciences, Osaka University, and Dr Takemasa, Department of Surgery, Sapporo Medical University, for fruitful discussions. This study was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare; and by a grant from the National Institute of Biomedical Innovation and Osaka University Drug Discovery Funds. Institutional endowments were received partially from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Evidence-Based Medical (EBM) Research Center, Idea Consultants, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan), and Kinshu-kai Medical Corporation (Osaka, Japan) [to Y.D., M.M. and H.I.]; Chugai Co., Ltd., Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd., and Merck Co., Ltd. [to Y.D., M.M. and T.S.]. These funders had no role in the main experimental equipment, supply expenses, study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This study received financial support from grants-in-aid for Scientific Research and P-DIRECT and P-CREATE grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, MEXT (to M.K., N.N., Y.D., M.M. and H.I.); Kobayashi Foundation for Cancer Research (to H.I.); Kobayashi International Scholarship Foundation (to M.K. and H.I.); a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare (to M.K., Y.D., M.M. and H.I.); and a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (Japan Society for the Promotion Science KAKENHI grant no. 17K16549) (to Y.N.).

References